
|
 |
Some low-income communities are not ready to take
advantage of new technologies. In those communities, the social fabric is
threadbare and people can focus on little beyond the most basic needs for
food, clothing, and shelter. In such settings, the wisest investments are
those that build the community’s "capacity"— that is, its
basic assets, such as affordable housing, health clinics, community
organizations, public transportation, banking services, retail stores,
roads, and sewage systems.
The hard truth is that until at least a basic level of
community capacity is in place, large-scale technology initiatives have
little hope of success. The only proven application of technology when
community capacity is very low is to arm local activists and other
"change agents" with communication tools such as email lists,
which can connect them to like-minded members of other communities that
have faced similar challenges.
No factor is more crucial to a community’s strength than the
condition of its housing, and no city exemplifies this dynamic more
clearly than New York.
In the early 1990s, after three decades of widespread real estate
divestment and abandonment, the city owned the title to tens of
thousands of dilapidated housing units in some of America’s
toughest, most crime-ridden neighborhoods. Over the past seven
years, the Neighborhood
Entrepreneurs Program (NEP), a public-private venture of the New
York City Partnership, has achieved remarkable success in building
community capacity by rehabilitating more than 3,500 dilapidated
homes in neighborhoods once given up for dead, including Harlem’s
140th Street, Brooklyn’s Bedford-Stuyvesant, and the Bronx’s
Hunts Point.
To bring about profound, neighborhood-wide change, NEP targets
clusters of city-owned buildings and then offers market incentives
to help small, local entrepreneurs acquire, refurbish, and manage
them. By providing affordable housing and entrepreneurship
opportunities, the program has enhanced community capacity in direct
ways. It has also done so indirectly, by catalyzing retail
development, job creation, capital formation, and community
organizing.
Helping to meet the fundamental need for safe, affordable housing
has provided the foundation upon which more ambitious efforts,
including those that involve clever applications of technology, can
be built. |
To Premise Five>>
|
 |
|