|
|  |

Speaking from within a foundation, I find the recent
comments by Daniel Ben-Horin from CompuMentor very well thought through
and devastatingly on target. Foundations, far from being reliably part of
the solution, for the present are mostly part of the problem. But they
represent a potential resource of no small magnitude, and consequently
working from within the philanthropic sector to move things along so that
more and more, foundations will invest in core organizational capacity
building (including IT infrastructure) in the nonprofit sector, and also
value incremental gains in accomplishment, seems to be a worthwhile thing
to do.
What follows is a purely personal view, not
reflecting in any way that of the foundation for which I work. I may have
missed a thread of the discussion, and if so I apologize. But it seams to
me that no serious consideration of a domestic Digital Peace Corps can be
complete without thinking about the role of government. In the end, part
of the strategy for bridging the "digital divide" between well
off and poor people/communities has to include a plan for shifting social
policy. There is some compelling history to revisit in thinking about this
- the WPA and CCC come to mind. But this would take the emergence of
extraordinary leadership, either in government or in circles that
government leaders listen to, and an acknowledgment that the widening
socioeconomic divide in this country can be thought of as an assault on
poor people by the major economic and social policy institutions of this
country. (The recent protests in Davos, Seattle, etc. are making this same
point on a global scale.)
David E.K. Hunter, Ph.D. Director of Assessments
Edna McConnell Clark Foundation
<<To previous post
| To next post>>
Back to summary
| |
 |